1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 583 F.Supp.
  5. 583 F.Supp. 446 (1984)
 

MAX DAETWYLER CORP. v. INPUT GRAPHICS, INC.

Civ. A. No. 81-1140.

583 F.Supp. 446 (1984)

MAX DAETWYLER CORP. and MDC Max Daetwyler, A.G. v. INPUT GRAPHICS, INC., Benton Graphics, Inc., Joseph Halbherr and Rufus Benton.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

March 30, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Manny D. Pokotilow, George S. Seltzer, Caesar, Rivise, Bernstein & Cohen, Ltd., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Robert C. Podwil, Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa., Peter T. Cobrin, Stempler & Cobrin, New York City, for defendants Benton Graphics and Rufus Benton.

Karl Spivak, Eric Marzluf, Steele, Gould & Fried, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants Input Graphics, Inc. and Joseph Halbherr.

OPINION

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and damages for alleged patent infringement and violations of § 43(a) of the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). In July of 1982, I denied defendants' motions for summary judgment as to both the patent infringement and the Lanham Act claims of the amended complaint. Max Daetwyler Corp. v. Input Graphics, 545 F.Supp. 165

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases