STATE v. HICKS

No. 8327SC1290.

320 S.E.2d 697 (1984)

STATE of North Carolina v. Danny Ray HICKS.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 2, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten, by Asst. Atty. Gen. Alfred N. Salley, Raleigh, for the State.

Harris, Bumgardner & Carpenter by Don H. Bumgardner, Gastonia, for defendant-appellant.


HILL, Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the trial court's denial of his motion to compel the prosecution to elect what theory of criminal activity defendant engaged in to commit the crime. G.S. 14-65 sets forth alternative theories in proving guilt: (1) proof that the defendant did the burning or (2) proof that the defendant procured another to do the burning. Defendant contends that the denial of his motion to compel an election placed him at a disadvantage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases