LACY v. G.D. SEARLE & CO.

Civ. A. No. 83C-SE-123.

484 A.2d 527 (1984)

Jacqueline M. LACY and Daniel C. Lacy, her husband, Plaintiffs, v. G.D. SEARLE & CO., a Delaware corporation, Richard Raiber, M.D., Richard Raiber, M.D., P.A., a professional corporation of the State of Delaware, and Wilmington Medical Center, a Delaware corporation, Defendants.

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County.

Decided October 31, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John G. Abramo, of Abramo & Abramo, Wilmington, for plaintiffs.

Warren B. Burt, Wilmington, for defendants Richard Raiber, M.D., and Richard Raiber, M.D., P.A.


TAYLOR, Judge.

Plaintiffs seek damages against defendants Richard Raiber, M.D., and Richard Raiber, M.D., P.A. [collectively Raiber] alleging medical malpractice by Raiber in connection with services undertaken relative to the use of an IUD by plaintiff Jacqueline Lacy.

Counts IX and X charge that Dr. Raiber is liable under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Count IX charges that plaintiff employed Dr. Raiber to remove an IUD which was imbedded in her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases