STATE EX REL. WILLIAMSON v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF ELECTIONS

No. 84-519.

11 Ohio St. 3d 90 (1984)

THE STATE, EX REL. WILLIAMSON, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 7, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David A. Williamson, pro se.

Messrs. Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, Mr. Avery S. Cohen and Mr. Kenneth A. Bravo, for respondent board of elections.

Mr. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Mr. John T. Williams, for respondent Secretary of State.

Mr. William E. Mahon, for intervening respondent Arthur P. Lambros.


Per Curiam.

We must first decide whether the votes cast for Lambros at the November 8, 1983 election may be counted. In Spangler, supra, we held that Lambros was not an eligible candidate at the time of the election. The temporary restraining order issued by the United States District Court was ultimately dissolved and therefore has no effect on the Spangler ruling. Thus, the only eligible candidate on the ballot was relator and only his votes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases