¶ Defendant brought the instant proceeding pursuant to CPL article 440 to vacate his 1975 convictions rendered upon a jury verdict. He contends that his convictions were unconstitutionally procured in that tainted identification evidence was introduced at the trial. It is clearly established, however, that defendant's counsel made an appropriate pretrial challenge to the identification procedures employed by the police, participated in a Wade hearing and objected...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
