1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 163 Cal.App.3d
  5. 163 Cal.App.3d 841 (1984)
 

HEIST v. COUNTY OF COLUSA

Docket No. 22737.

163 Cal.App.3d 841 (1984)

213 Cal. Rptr. 278

LEN HEIST, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF COLUSA et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

July 31, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Edward T. Ford and Walter Cook for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Harold Wilsey, Jr., County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.

McDonough,, Holland & Allen, William L. Owen and Sharon D. Roseme as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

EVANS, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment which found the abandonment of Laux Road by the Colusa County Board of Supervisors was valid. He asserts the trial court did not properly review the proceeding, arguing: (1) the act of abandoning a county road is judicial in nature, subject to review under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. He further argues that (2) the board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases