OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of one count of possession of stolen property. At trial, appellant's primary defense was that he was not aware of the stolen nature of the property which he possessed at the time of his arrest.
Over appellant's objection, the trial court advised the jury that appellant could be found guilty of possession of stolen property if he possessed the property "knowing that the goods or property...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
