McLAUGHLIN v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INS. CO.

No. C-81-4367-MHP.

565 F.Supp. 434 (1983)

Ruth L. McLAUGHLIN, Thomas W. McLaughlin, Plaintiffs, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Does I through X, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

May 3, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig G. McIntosh, Katz & McIntosh, Inc., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Bradley A. Levin, Law Offices of Guy O. Kornblum, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.


ORDER

PATEL, District Judge.

I.

This action arises out of defendant Connecticut General Life Insurance's ("Connecticut General") denial of Ruth and Thomas McLaughlin's claim for expenses incurred at the Immunology Researching Centre. Plaintiffs1 allege three separate causes of action: breach of the insurance contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases