1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 662 P.2d
  5. 662 P.2d 321 (1983)
 

IN RE CONDUCT OF RUDIE

No. OSB 81-42, SC 28951.

662 P.2d 321 (1983)

In re Complaint As to the CONDUCT OF Peter S. RUDIE, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided April 19, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George S. Frum of Frum & Bledsoe, Salem, argued the cause and filed a brief for the accused.

Jean W. Christensen, Salem, argued the cause and filed a brief for the Oregon State Bar.

Before LENT, C.J., and PETERSON, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, CARSON and JONES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The primary issue is the appropriate sanction to be imposed for conduct of the accused that was in violation of certain disciplinary rules contained in the Code of Professional Conduct.

The following facts are taken from the accused's brief in this court:

"The accused at the time of trial of the Hoekstre matter was 29 years of age, had been admitted to practice law in the State of Oregon in 1975 and engaged in the practice of law in Salem...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases