Defendant argues that his conviction should be reversed on the grounds that an inculpatory statement made by him to the police was improperly admitted in evidence because (1) it was made subsequent to an arrest which was not based on probable cause and (2) defendant's father was not in the interrogation room when defendant (who was 17) made the statement. The facts leading up to defendant's arrest are uncontroverted. State Police Investigator Zeboris had been investigating...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.