1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. 1 (1983)
 

EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORP. v. FIREMAN'S FUND INS. CO.

95 N.J. 1 (1983)

468 A.2d 421

EMPLOYERS REINSURANCE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 29, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Suarez argued the cause for appellant (Suarez & Suarez, attorneys).

Richard D. Catenacci argued the cause for respondent (Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys; Richard D. Catenacci and Patricia J. Pindar, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

This appeal requires us to interpret and apply a provision in an Insurance Agents and Brokers Errors and Omissions (E & O) policy. The policy was designed to protect The Burrus Agency, Inc. (Burrus), an East Orange insurance agent and broker, in the event of liability for breach of duty in its business of selling and servicing all types of insurance coverage. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (Fireman's) furnished the E & O coverage from 1972 to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases