BESLITY v. MANHATTAN HONDA


120 Misc.2d 848 (1983)

James M. Beslity, Appellant, v. Manhattan Honda, a Division of Dah Chong Hong Trading Corp., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

May 10, 1983


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Beslity, appellant pro se.

DUDLEY, P. J., RICCOBONO and SULLIVAN, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Judgment dated May 6, 1982 is reversed, with $30 costs; judgment is awarded in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $50.

Plaintiff, an attorney, brought this small claims action to recover $800 damages and attorney's fees upon the ground that the defendant Manhattan Honda had engaged in false advertising in violation of subdivision 3 of section 350-d of the General Business Law (L 1980, ch 345...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases