1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 299 S.E.2d
  5. 299 S.E.2d 664 (1983)
 

HARVEY v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RY. CO., INC.

No. 822SC142.

299 S.E.2d 664 (1983)

J.H. HARVEY v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, INC. and Southern Railway System, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 1, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L.H. Ross, Washington, for plaintiff-appellant.

Rodman, Rodman, Holscher & Francisco by Edward N. Rodman, Washington, for defendant-appellee.

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff's sole argument is that the trial court erred in granting defendant Railway's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because Railway either expressly or by implication assumed the obligation to pay his medical expenses for life. We do not agree. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is technically a renewal of the motion for a directed verdict. Love v. Pressley, 34 N.C. App. 503

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases