SCHREEFEL v. OKULY

Docket No. 22789.

143 Cal.App.3d 818 (1983)

192 Cal. Rptr. 402

PHILLIP CAREL SCHREEFEL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOSEPH WILLIAM OKULY et al., Defendants and Appellants; NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY, Intervener and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

May 26, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Maynard O. Kartvedt, McInnis, Fitzgerald, Rees, Sharkey & McIntyre and William R. Warhurst for Plaintiff and Appellant and for Defendants and Appellants.

Schall, Boudreau & Gore and Robert D. Woods for Intervener and Respondents.


OPINION

COLOGNE, J.

Phillip Carel Schreefel appeals the judgment rendered in his favor, contending the jury was not allowed to consider punitive damages for alleged wilful misconduct, and Joseph William Okuly and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (jointly, Railroad) cross-appeal, contending admiralty law should not have been applied to allow the claim of Schreefel's employer, National Steel and Shipbuilding Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases