1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 143 Cal.App.3d
  5. 143 Cal.App.3d 810 (1983)
 

RUMAC, INC. v. BOTTOMLEY

Docket No. 24875.

143 Cal.App.3d 810 (1983)

192 Cal. Rptr. 104

RUMAC, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROBERT BOTTOMLEY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

June 10, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Miller, Boyko & Bell and Robert K. Schraner for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Robert G. Steiner and Charles A. Bird for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

WIENER, J.

(1) (See fn. 1.) This appeal1 involves the scope of that part of Code of Civil Procedure section 2016, subdivision (b) which provides: "... any writing that reflects an attorney's impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories shall not be discoverable under any circumstances."2

(2a) Attorney Robert Bottomley...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases