Judgment affirmed.
The only issue on this appeal is whether the hearing court erred in refusing to suppress the defendant's incriminatory statements obtained in the absence of counsel. It is undisputed that the interrogating officers were aware that defendant had several prior arrests and that he denied that he was represented by counsel when the officers made appropriate inquiry (see People v Smith,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
