1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 461 A.2d
  5. 461 A.2d 465 (1983)
 

RITTENHOUSE v. RITTENHOUSE

No. 82-617.

461 A.2d 465 (1983)

Jack RITTENHOUSE, Appellant, v. Kathleen C. RITTENHOUSE, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided May 16, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Mudd, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Leo N. Gorman, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief, for appellee.

Before MACK and TERRY, Associate Judges, and PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant here challenges the denial of his "Motion for Relief From Order of Support," in which he sought a reduction in the amount of his child support payments. This action commenced upon appellee's filing of a petition under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), D.C.Code § 30-301 et seq. (1981), in Maryland. Appellee sought support for appellant's three children. The Maryland court ordered appellant to pay a "fair and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases