ARMSTRONG v. CARR

No. CX-83-1493.

341 N.W.2d 582 (1983)

Gary ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. Robert L. CARR, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 4, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel L. Giles, Marshall, for appellant.

Robert L. Gjorvad, Marshall, for respondent.

Considered by POPOVICH, C.J., and FOLEY and SEDGWICK, JJ., and decided by the court with oral argument waived.


OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

This case involves an appeal by Gary Armstrong of a judgment denying him reimbursement from Robert Carr for retiling the floor of a building he leased from Carr. Armstrong sought reimbursement under a theory of unjust enrichment. The trial court found that the lease obligated Armstrong to pay for the retiling. We affirm.

Carr initially leased the building to City Products Corporation. City Products assigned

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases