Judgment affirmed.
On this appeal defendant contends that (1) the search of his brother's apartment, after he and a codefendant were taken into custody, was invalid due to the absence of a warrant and (2) the fruits of that search must be suppressed. We disagree. At the suppression hearing defendant failed to demonstrate a legitimate expectation of privacy in his brother's apartment. Thus, he lacks standing to challenge the warrantless search of that apartment. (See...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
