1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 295 Md.
  5. 295 Md. 586 (1983)
 

MD. COMM'N ON HUMAN REL. v. BETH. STEEL

[No. 25, September Term, 1982.]

295 Md. 586 (1983)

457 A.2d 1146

MARYLAND COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 29, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Risselle Rosenthal Fleisher, General Counsel, with whom was Philip L. Marcus, Associate General Counsel, on the brief, for appellant.

Douglas D. Connah, Jr., with whom were Venable, Baetjer & Howard on the brief, for appellee.

Amicus curiae brief of Llewellyn B. Wakeman filed by Charles J. Wargo.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON and RODOWSKY, JJ.

DAVIDSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case presents a question concerning the doctrine of exhaustion of statutorily prescribed administrative and judicial remedies. More particularly, the question is whether a party may have recourse to a court without exhausting statutorily prescribed administrative proceedings and judicial review if the principal question presented before the agency concerns the interpretation of an agency rule.

On 12 December...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases