We affirm because we do not believe the appellants have demonstrated reversible error in the trial court's judgment, which was principally predicated upon a determination that the appellants' conduct in keeping and training dogs for attack and security purposes constituted a nuisance in the residential neighborhood where all of the parties resided. The appellees have conceded that the judgment does not apply...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
