WEBB, Judge.
In his first assignment of error the respondent contends that the commitment order is void on its face because the court did not record facts to support the order as required by G.S. 122-58.7. He says this is so because the court recorded the facts by placing the letter "x" in the boxes on the commitment order form beside the facts and other findings it made. He says this violates the rule of In re Jacobs,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
