McCLISH v. PAN-O-GOLD BAKING CO.

No. C3-82-1146.

336 N.W.2d 538 (1983)

Lyle H. McCLISH, Respondent, v. PAN-O-GOLD BAKING COMPANY and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Relators, Pan-O-Gold Baking Company and Vigilant Insurance Co., Employer and Insurer, Pan-O-Gold Baking Company and City Insurance Co. (Home Ins. Co.), Employer and Insurer.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

Petition for Rehearing Denied August 5, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald W. Anderson, Gilmore, de Lambert, Aafedt, Eustis & Forde, Minneapolis, for relator Pan-O-Gold Baking Co. and Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Curtis H. Foster, St. Paul, for respondent McClish.

Michael C. Jackman, Minneapolis, for Vigilant Ins. Co.

Louis R. Tilton, Minneapolis, for City Ins. Co.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.


KELLEY, Justice.

By writ of certiorari, employer-relator Pan-O-Gold Baking Company and insurer-relator Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Pan-O-Gold) seek review of a decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals affirming an award of temporary total and permanent partial disability to Lyle H. McClish, employee-respondent. Pan-O-Gold challenges findings that McClish sustained back injuries and that he was totally disabled therefrom. It

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases