This action is brought directly against the liability insurer of the party alleged to be liable for plaintiff's personal injuries. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer, on the ground that the insurance policy clearly and unambiguously excluded coverage of the liability in question, and therefore the insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify the insured. Plaintiff appeals.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
DAGGS v. FOREMOST INS. CO.
Docket No. 68335.
148 Cal.App.3d 726 (1983)
196 Cal. Rptr. 193
ELTON M. DAGGS, JR., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 4, 1983.
November 4, 1983.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Barry M. Schiller for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Staitman & Snyder, Jack M. Staitman and Ernest Allen Wish for Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
