1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 669 P.2d
  5. 669 P.2d 196 (1983)
 

MANGUM v. CITY OF OROFINO

No. 14231.

669 P.2d 196 (1983)

105 Idaho 307

Dean MANGUM and Diane Mangum, Husband and Wife, Lyman McCandless and Arbella McCandless, Husband and Wife, as Representatives, and on behalf of property owners affected by City Ordinance Number 552, commonly known as Canada Hill LID Project, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF OROFINO, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

September 7, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Kinney, Orofino, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Michael E. McNichols, Orofino, for defendant-respondent.

Michael C. Moore, Lewiston, for amicus curiae Ass'n of Idaho Cities.

HUNTLEY, Justice.

Appellants are property owners within the City of Orofino. They brought this action against the city when the city council passed an ordinance establishing a Local Improvement District which included their property. Appellants allege that I.C. § 50-1709, which sets out the procedure whereby a proposed Local Improvement District (LID) may be protested by affected property owners, is unconstitutional.

In 1979 the City of Orofino applied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases