1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 702 F.2d
  5. 702 F.2d 162 (1983)
 

NATHANSON v. UNITED STATES

No. 82-1360.

702 F.2d 162 (1983)

Stanley Herbert NATHANSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Allan Campbell, Individually and in his capacity as Executive Director of the United States Civil Service Commission; Clifford Alexander, Jr., Individually and in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Army; Lieut. Gen. John W. Morris, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Maj. Gen. Richard L. Harris, Individually and in his official capacity as North Central Division Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Col. Forrest T. Gay, III, Individually and in his official capacity as St. Paul District Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; William Goetz, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief, Construction-Operations Division, St. Paul District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; William D. Parsons, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief, General Regulatory Branch, Construction-Operations Division, St. Paul District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided March 23, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pepin, Dayton, Herman, Graham & Getts by Philip W. Getts, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.

Michael H. Ferring, Counsel, Corps of Engineers, James M. Rosenbaum, U.S. Atty. by John M. Lee, Asst. U.S. Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., for defendants.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

LAY, Chief Judge.

Stanley H. Nathanson appeals from adverse findings and judgment made by the district court, the Honorable Donald D. Alsop presiding, dismissing his complaint relating to his termination of employment with the United States Army Corps of Engineers. In 1977 Nathanson was a probationary employee working as an applications review specialist with the Corps. He alleged that he was unlawfully terminated due to his expression of opinion and speech in violation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases