PONDER v. BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Docket No. 66903.

145 Cal.App.3d 709 (1983)

193 Cal. Rptr. 632

MARLENE PONDER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

August 4, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Jeffrey B. Harrison for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Munger, Tolles & Rickershauser, Daniel P. Garcia, Allen M. Katz and Lucy T. Eisenberg for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

JOHNSON, J.

This appeal is from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurance company, Blue Cross of Southern California (Blue Cross). The plaintiffs, Marlene and Tommie Ponder, are policyholders denied coverage for treatment of a condition suffered by Mrs. Ponder. In response to this refusal, the Ponders filed a complaint seeking declaratory relief as well as damages for breach of contract and tortious breach of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases