We all agree that plaintiff was entitled to restitution measured by the difference between the contract price and the market price, with respect to oil deliveries which it was judicially enjoined to make to the city between August 27, 1979 and February 29, 1980. Of 3,364,893 gallons delivered only 464,550 gallons were paid at market price, as billed. The balance, also billed at market price, was paid at contract price. Ultimately plaintiff was vindicated in its position that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
