KANE v. TRI-CO. METRO. TRANSP. DIST.

No. 82-0073C; CA A26359.

670 P.2d 178 (1983)

65 Or.App. 55

Henry KANE, Individually and On Behalf of a Class of Self-Employed Natural Persons, Appellant, v. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OF OREGON, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 12, 1983.

Reconsideration Denied November 25, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Kane, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the brief pro se for appellant.

Charles F. Hinkle, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Gersham Goldstein, Joel D. Kuntz and Stoel, Rives, Boley, Fraser & Wyse, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action for declaratory judgment, alleging that defendant's Ordinance No. 92 is unconstitutional in that it imposes an income tax on self-employed persons1 and on no other class of individuals or businesses. He appeals from a judgment for defendant entered after the latter's motion for summary judgment was granted as to all five claims for relief. We affirm.

Defendant is a municipal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases