BARRINGTON v. EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'N

No. 8310IC23.

309 S.E.2d 539 (1983)

Claudia BARRINGTON and Melvin Barrington, Parents of Donald H. Barrington, Deceased, Employee, Plaintiffs, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION and/or Economic Improvement Council, Employer, United States Fire Insurance Company and/or Sentry Insurance, A Mutual Company, Carrier, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 20, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patterson, Dilthey, Clay, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog by Richard T. Boyette, Raleigh, for defendants-appellants, Economic Improvement Council and Sentry Insurance, A Mutual Company.

Young, Moore, Henderson & Alvis by Edward B. Clark and B.T. Henderson, II, Raleigh, for defendants-appellees, Employment Security Commission and United States Fire Insurance Company.


BRASWELL, Judge.

The sole question presented asks whether the result reached by the Industrial Commission is contrary to law as set forth in Godley v. County of Pitt, 306 N.C. 357, 293 S.E.2d 167 (1982). Having determined as a matter of law that we are bound by the doctrine of the law of the case, it is not appropriate for this Court to consider what the Supreme Court said in the above cited decision. Consequently, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases