1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 673 P.2d
  5. 673 P.2d 172 (1983)
 

IN RE WHIPPLE

No. SC 29728.

673 P.2d 172 (1983)

296 Or. 105

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Jay W. WHIPPLE, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided November 29, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert P. Van Natta, St. Helens, argued the cause for the accused. With him on the brief was Van Natta & Petersen, St. Helens.

Larry Brisbee, Hillsboro, Oregon, argued the cause and submitted the brief for Oregon State Bar.

PER CURIAM.

This is an attorney discipline case involving a loan from a client to the lawyer. The lawyer is accused of violating DR5-104(A) which provides:

"A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client if they have differing interests therein and if the client expects the lawyer to exercise his professional judgment therein for the protection of the client, unless the client has consented after full disclosure."

In both In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases