Dec. 5, 1983.
Per Curiam:
The appellants brought this action for partition of a cotenancy in which they owned the surface rights and one-half of the mineral rights. The respondents owned the remaining half of the mineral rights. Respondents moved for summary judgment, and summary judgment was granted on the ground that appellants impliedly agreed not to seek partition of the mineral rights.
The record does not reveal that this ground was properly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.