MULLMAN v. HOGAN


121 Misc.2d 719 (1983)

Lawrence Mullman, Petitioner, v. Carroll Hogan et al., Respondents.

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County.

November 21, 1983


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brett, Apfelberg & Epstein (Errol Brett of counsel), for respondents. Rosenberg & Estis, P. C. (Warren A. Estis and William A. Zult of counsel), for petitioner.


RICHARD S. LANE, J.

Respondent's motion to vacate judgment by inquest attacks both subject matter and personal jurisdiction.

Pursuant to a co-operative conversion plan in 1981, respondent subscribed to and purchased the shares allocated to his apartment in premise 35 East 85th Street. His purchase was subject to financing provided by the sponsor for the unpaid balance of the subscription price. By the spring of 1983 he was substantially in arrears...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases