1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 97 A.D.2d
  5. 97 A.D.2d 736 (1983)
 

SCHAMMEL v. SCHAMMEL

97 A.D.2d 736 (1983)

Leonard Schammel, Respondent, v. Marilyn Schammel, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 22, 1983

While there was no need to strike the action from the Trial Calendar merely because a dispute existed over some questions put to plaintiff, neither should the defendant be precluded from seeking answers which were properly within the scope of discovery available under part B of section 236 of the Domestic Relations Law. (Schulman v Neubardt, 87 A.D.2d 587, 588; Cohen v Heine & Co., 39 A.D.2d 563

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases