YOUNGMAN v. TAHMOUSH


457 A.2d 376 (1983)

Bruce YOUNGMAN, Plaintiff, v. Albert J. TAHMOUSH, et al., Defendants.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County.

Decided January 5, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin Gross, Morris & Rosenthal, P.A., Wilmington, and Mordecai Rosenfeld, P.C., New York City, for plaintiff.

James F. Burnett, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, and Kurt L. Schultz, and James R. Vogler, Winston & Strawn, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.


HARTNETT, Vice Chancellor.

Defendants moved to dismiss this stockholder's derivative action on the grounds that plaintiff has an incurable conflict of interest which precludes his representation of the stockholders. The motion must be denied.

I

This stockholder's derivative action was brought by plaintiff, Bruce Youngman, on behalf of all the stockholders of Frank B. Hall & Company ("Hall") for damages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases