STATE v. HARRISON

No. 83-88.

442 So.2d 389 (1983)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Hoyt Vernon HARRISON, a/k/a James Harrison, Sr., and Patricia Wolack, Respondents.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 14, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Max Rudmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

J. David Bogenschutz of Varon & Stahl, P.A., Hollywood, for respondent Harrison.

Robert M. Leen of Leen and Schneider, Hollywood, for respondent Patricia Wolack.


PER CURIAM.

Based upon the authority of Novo v. Scott, 438 So.2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA, 1983) we grant the state's petition for certiorari and quash the trial court's order which held that section 914.04, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1982) is unconstitutional. We adopt the rationale of our sister court and "hold that section 914.04 is constitutional and affords a witness derivative-use immunity." Novo v. Scott, supra.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases