1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 9 Ohio
  5. 9 Ohio App. 3d 73 (1983)
 

NUNNEKER v. MURDOCK

No. C-820333.

9 Ohio App. 3d 73 (1983)

NUNNEKER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. MURDOCK ET AL., APPELLEES.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hamilton County.

Decided March 9, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. French, Marks, Short, Weiner & Valleau and Mr. Donald M. Hemmer, for appellants.

Mr. Simon L. Leis, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Roger E. Friedman, for appellees Board of County Commissioners et al.

Messrs. Paxton & Seasongood and Mr. Charles W. Anness, for appellees Roger I. Kuhn et al.

Mr. William J. Brown, attorney general, and Mr. Thomas V. Martin, for Secretary of State et al.

BLACK, J.

This appeal focuses on the sufficiency under R.C. 303.12 of a referendum petition that was signed and submitted by electors of Springfield Township, but rejected by the Hamilton County Commissioners. Specifically, the petition called for a vote on a resolution adopted by the county commissioners that would amend the zoning of certain property in Springfield Township from "C-Residence" to "DD-Planned Multiple Residence." After Resolution No. 641, allowing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases