The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the order of Supreme Court denying defendant's motion for summary judgment reinstated.
We conclude that the restrictive agreement between Edward Satenstein and the Chaloux' is ambiguous and that it cannot be determined as a matter of law on examination of the agreement alone whether transfer by intestate succession did or did not fall...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
