IN RE PROPOSALS D & H

Docket No. 70862, (Calendar No. 19).

417 Mich. 409 (1983)

339 N.W.2d 848

In re PROPOSALS D & H MICHIGAN STATE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE v. STATE OF MICHIGAN

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided October 17, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone (by John D. Pirich and Brian A. Kaser) for the plaintiffs.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, and Michael J. Hodge and Gary P. Gordon, Assistants Attorney General, for the defendants.

Amici Curiae:

Loomis, Ewert, Ederer, Parsley, Davis & Gotting (by George W. Loomis, Lawrence J. Gagnon, Harvey J. Messing, and Ronald W. Bloomberg) for various public utilities.


BOYLE, J.

The issues of law in this case, as stipulated by the parties and as certified by the Ingham Circuit Court, are as follows:

"1. Where (a) an initiative proposal to amend a statute is placed on the ballot by petition of the electorate, pursuant to Const 1963, art 2, § 9 and (b) the Legislature enacts an amendment to the same statute, subject to Const 1963, art 4, § 34 after the initiative petitions have been filed and (c) there are conflicting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases