1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 669 P.2d
  5. 669 P.2d 154 (1983)
 

BIDAR v. AMFAC, INC.

No. 8587.

669 P.2d 154 (1983)

Alta E. BIDAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMFAC, INC., a Hawaii corporation, John Does 1-5, Roe Corporations 1-3, Defendants-Appellees.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

September 16, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Krueger, Wailuku (Virgil James Wilson, III, Wailuku, with him on briefs, Kevin W. Geer, Wailuku, with them on opening brief; James Krueger, A Law Corporation, Wailuku, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Roy A. Vitousek, III, Honolulu (David Schulmeister, Honolulu, with him on brief, Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, Honolulu, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Amfac, Inc.

Before LUM, C.J., NAKAMURA, PADGETT, and HAYASHI, JJ., and Circuit Judge SPENCER assigned by reason of vacancy.

NAKAMURA, Justice.

The question for decision is whether the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit erred in awarding Amfac, Inc. (Amfac), a hotel owner and operator, summary judgment in an action brought by Alta Bidar (Mrs. Bidar or the plaintiff) to recover damages for injuries sustained in a fall that occurred while she was a guest at an Amfac hotel in Lahaina, Maui. Although we see no error in the grant of judgment in Amfac's favor on Mrs. Bidar's product liability...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases