TEEL v. WEYERHAEUSER CO.

CA A23460, SC 29001.

660 P.2d 155 (1983)

294 Or. 588

In the Matter of the COMPENSATION OF Robert W. TEEL, Claimant. Robert W. TEEL, Petitioner On Review, v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided March 22, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David C. Force, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner on review. On the petition was Christopher D. Moore, Eugene.

Ridgway Foley, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. On the response to the petition for review were Mildred J. Carmack and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.

Before LENT, C.J., LINDE, PETERSON, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS and CARSON, JJ., and JONES, J. Pro-Tem.


LENT, Chief Justice.

Does an employer who challenges a Workers' Compensation Board's holding that a claim is compensable initiate an appeal within the meaning of ORS 656.382(2) where that challenge takes the form of a cross-appeal to an appeal by the claimant, requesting an award of attorney fees? ORS 656.382(2) provides:

"If a request for hearing, request for review or court appeal is initiated by an employer or insurer, and the referee, board or court finds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases