1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 576 F.Supp.
  5. 576 F.Supp. 234 (1983)
 

KIRSCHNER v. CABLE/TEL CORP.

Civ. A. No. 83-1487.

576 F.Supp. 234 (1983)

Isadore L. KIRSCHNER, Michael S. Kirschner, Frederick M. Kirschner and Morton Goodman v. CABLE/TEL CORP., Cable/Tel Systems Corp., Six Star Cablevision Holding Co., Inc., Cable Promotions, Inc., Six Star Cablevision Construction Co., Inc. (as successor to Micro Constructors, Inc.), Six Star Cablevision Management Corp., Communications Finance Systems, Inc., Six Star Cablevision of Kansas City, Kansas, Inc., Six Star Cablevision of Bonner Springs, Kansas, Inc., Six Star Cablevision of Inglewood, Inc., Stuart C. Harris, Roger H. Maggio, Paul L. Skulsky, Martin E. Hecht, Schekter, Aber, Rishy & Goldstein, P.C. (as successor to Schekter, Aber & Hecht, P.C.), Investors Planning Group, Inc., Tom Kaye, Arnold H. Bruck.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

November 14, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Innelli, Daniel E. Bacine, Leonard Barrack, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Louis W. Fryman, Jeffrey B. Albert, Philadelphia, Pa., for Cable/Tel Corp., Cable/Tel Systems Corp., Six Star Cablevision Holding Co., Inc., Cable Promotions, Inc., Six Star Cablevision Const. Co., Inc. (as successor to Micro Constructors, Inc.), Six Star Cablevision Management Corp., Communications Finance Systems, Inc., Six Star Cablevision of Bonner Springs, Kansas, Inc., Six Star Cablevision of Kansas City, Kansas, Inc., Six Star Cablevision of Inglewood, Inc., Harris, Maggio & Skulsky.

Richard Asche, Lawrence J. Fox, Philadelphia, Pa., for Martin E. Hecht.

John W. Frazier, IV, Philadelphia, Pa., for Schekter, Aber, Rishy & Goldstein, P.C.

David L. Braverman, Philadelphia, Pa., for Investors Planning Group, Inc., Kaye & Bruck.

Graeme W. Bush, Harrison J. Cohen, Washington, D.C., for Roger H. Maggio.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BECHTLE, District Judge.

This case involves allegations of common law fraud, breach of contract, violation of section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO").1 Presently before the Court is a motion to dismiss on behalf of thirteen of eighteen defendants.2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases