HILL, Judge.
By his first assignment of error, defendant contends the court erred in failing to instruct the jury that certain photographs admitted as plaintiff's exhibits were admitted for illustrative purposes only and were not substantive evidence. Clearly such photographs are not admissible as substantive evidence, 1 Stansbury's N.C.Evidence § 34 (Brandis rev. 1973), but they are admissible for the purpose of illustrating testimony and were so used by the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
