MAGNEY v. LINCOLN MUT. SAV. BANK

No. 4929-9-III.

34 Wn. App. 45 (1983)

659 P.2d 537

RICHARD A. MAGNEY, ET AL, Respondents, v. LINCOLN MUTUAL SAVINGS BANK, Appellant, GARY L. NICKESON, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

February 17, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Allison and Randall & Danskin, for appellant.

Joseph Simpson, James E. Winton, John T. Krall, and Richter, Wimberley & Ericson, for respondents.


ROE, C.J.

The issue in this case is whether a state chartered mutual savings bank may enforce a "due-on-sale" provision in a deed of trust when the borrower later assigns his interest in the property and there is no increased risk to the lender.

In 1977, plaintiffs Richard and Lynn Magney purchased a 4-family dwelling. To finance the purchase price of $76,000, Magneys borrowed $55,000 from defendant Lincoln Mutual Savings Bank. They signed a promissory note...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases