POST v. 120 EAST END AVE. CORP.


95 A.D.2d 697 (1983)

Seymour C. Post, Respondent, v. 120 East End Avenue Corporation, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 16, 1983


We do not agree with our dissenting colleagues that the violation alleged, if found to exist, is readily curable within the 10-day period prescribed by RPAPL 753 (subd 4), and consider it unnecessary to address the other issues discussed in the dissenting opinion.

Silverman and Bloom, JJ., dissent in a memorandum by Bloom, J., as follows:

This appeal again presents us with the question of the effect of RPAPL 753 (subd 4), upon the discretionary power of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases