1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 93 A.D.2d
  5. 93 A.D.2d 695 (1983)
 

LITMAN v. LITMAN

93 A.D.2d 695 (1983)

Eugene Litman, Respondent, v. Phyllis Litman, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 31, 1983

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonas, Libert & Weinstein (Kenneth J. Weinstein and Richard C. Goldberg of counsel), for appellant.

Solerwitz, Solerwitz & Leeds (Barbara J. Simon of counsel), for respondent.

MOLLEN, P. J., WEINSTEIN, BROWN and RUBIN, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

This appeal presents the question of whether a spouse's law practice is subject to equitable distribution upon the dissolution of a marriage. Special Term held that a law practice is not a proper subject for equitable distribution, and thereupon denied the defendant wife's application for funds to enable her to retain experts to determine the value of her husband's law practice. In its decision (Litman v Litman, 115 Misc...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases