PEOPLE v. COFRESI


60 N.Y.2d 728 (1983)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alberto Cofresi, Miguel Cofresi, and Heriberto Torres, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 18, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chester L. Mirsky for Miguel Cofresi, appellant.

Franklyn Gould for Alberto Cofresi, appellant.

Arthur M. Unterman for Heriberto Torres, appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney (Alexandra Valicenti and Peter D. Coddington of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Having relied upon "automatic standing" at a time when the continued existence of that doctrine as a matter of State law was in serious question (see United States v Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83; People v Hansen, 38 N.Y.2d 17), and failed to offer at the suppression hearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases