The hearing court, finding that 185 days were chargeable to the prosecution, granted defendant's motion to dismiss under CPL 30.30 (subd 1, par [a]). Upon appeal, the prosecution challenges the hearing court's inclusion of the 22-day period from May 13, 1980 to June 4, 1980. The record clearly indicates that, on May 13, 1980, an associate of the defense attorney requested an adjournment because the defense attorney was on trial. The court granted the defense request for an...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
