1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 145 Cal.App.3d
  5. 145 Cal.App.3d 635 (1983)
 

PEOPLE v. TOCKGO

Docket No. 43972.

145 Cal.App.3d 635 (1983)

193 Cal. Rptr. 503

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. YOUNG TOCKGO, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

August 2, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Stephen A. Glasser for Defendant and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp and Robert H. Philibosian, District Attorneys, Donald J. Kaplan, Arnold T. Guminski and Maurice H. Oppenheim, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

JOHNSON, J.

Challenging the sufficiency of a warrant for the seizure of stolen property, defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subds. (a) and (j)). We transferred the appeal under rule 62(a), California Rules of Court. At issue is the sufficiency of the description of the property to be seized. We find the search warrant on its face fails to "particularly describe" the property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases