Defendant Weiner was employed by plaintiff Mayer-Beaton, as head of its blouse division. That division was a "private label" operation. It manufactured blouses in accordance with designs and specifications given by its customers, usually department stores, which were sold under the customers' labels. Defendant Gobrili was a pattern maker employed by Mayer-Beaton. Both Weiner and Gobrili were employed under oral agreements terminable at will. It is undisputed that neither...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
